Episode 434: Lady Bird Deeds

Trusts and wills are one way for a grantor to hand over their estate to a recipient of their choice. But many of us don’t have much to leave once we pass. Sometimes all the large property a grantor may have are a house and a car. The car title can be handled easily via a simple process through the local department of motor vehicles (DMV). While living, the grantor can complete a Beneficiary Designation Form. If this form has not been completed, a living heir of the decedent can submit an Affidavit of Heirship form to the local DMV.

For real property, such as a house, one of the best and easiest ways to leave your house to someone upon your death is what is called a “Lady Bird Deed.” The legal term for this type of deed is an Enhanced Life Estate Warranty Deed. It earned the name of Lady Bird Deed after Claudia “Lady Bird” Johnson, the wife of Former United States President Lyndon B. Johnson. Lady Bird used one of these deeds to transfer some of her real property to her daughter. The process was easy, effective, and legally recognized as a testamentary transfer. The name “Lady Bird Deed” was apparently catchy and much easier to say, thus the nickname stuck.

What exactly is a Lady Bird Deed? According to the associates at the Hap May firm, it is pure genius is what it is. Read on to know exactly how a Lady Bird Deed works, as well as knowing your rights under it (both as grantor and grantee).

Lady Bird Deed vs. Regular Warranty Deed

The long and short of it is that a Lady Bird Deed reserves the right for the grantor to revoke the transfer during the life of the grantor, whereas transfers under Warranty Deeds cannot be revoked once signed and recorded. Lady Bird Deeds are similar to wills — the grantor can change their mind anytime up to their death. Whoever is named as grantee under a Lady Bird Deed is automatically granted title to the house once the grantor passes. But grantee beware: the grantor is well within their right to execute a subsequent contradictory Lady Bird Deed for the same property to someone else. In that case, the first deed is revoked, and the original grantee has no more rights to the house at that point.

Take the following scenario of a client who came to an attorney. The client’s grandmother had passed away. The granddaughter had a deed in which her grandmother had conveyed to the granddaughter the grandmother’s house before the grandmother passed away. As if losing her grandmother wasn’t enough, she was being hailed to court pursuant to an eviction suit, from someone claiming to have ownership rights to the house – her mother (grandmother’s daughter).

Before the grandmother passed, and previous to the execution of granddaughter’s deed, the grandmother had executed a Lady Bird deed to her daughter, giving her daughter full ownership rights to the house upon grandmother’s death. Days after the deed was signed and recorded, the daughter left the state and her dying mother behind. In the daughter’s absence, the granddaughter chose to stay and live with her sick grandmother and take care of her grandmother who was battling cancer.

With her daughter gone, the grandmother began to rethink deeding her home to the daughter. Since the granddaughter had devoted herself to caring for the grandmother, and because the granddaughter was using the house as a primary residence, the grandmother decided to execute another Lady Bird deed on behalf of her granddaughter.

When the grandmother passed away a few months later, the granddaughter used the Lady Bird deed to execute an affidavit of ownership and filed both in the property records. The house now belonged to the granddaughter.

However, when the daughter heard of her mother’s passing, she argued the house was hers because she was deeded the property first and had recorded it in the property records well before the granddaughter’s deed. This left the daughter and granddaughter contesting ownership of the property.

Ultimately, who does the house belong to?

The answer is in the type of deed that the grandmother executed, a Lady Bird Deed. This is because there is a substantial difference between it and a regular warranty deed, one is revokable, and the other is not.

If the grandmother had executed a regular warranty deed when she deeded the house to her daughter, then the mother would be correct. Generally, the rule is “first in time, first in right” – meaning that if you receive a deed first, and record it in the property records, the grantor has nothing left to deed to anyone else. If the grandmother had granted a warranty deed to her daughter, the second deed to the granddaughter would have been essentially worthless. However, a Lady Bird deed includes a special provision that basically says a grantor maintains all rights to the property during their lifetime, to live in it, make changes to it, and to transfer or even sell it. And the grantor has the right to change their minds and revoke the deed at any time, without the permission of the grantee, at any time during the grantor’s lifetime. Revocation is as simple as executing another Lady Bird Deed on behalf of another grantee. Since the grandmother had granted a simple Lady Bird Deed to her daughter, executing another deed to the granddaughter legally revoked the deed to her daughter.

Therefore, the house legally belongs to the granddaughter.

The Genius of a Lady Bird Deed

The ability for a grantor to revoke a previously executed deed is a remarkable feature. The grantor can do so without the initial grantee having any say in the matter. The grantor needs no permission, and the person who was originally deeded the property does not even have to be aware of the change.

Revocation can happen in one of two ways:

  1. File a revocation in real property records that basically says, “I hereby revoke this deed.”
  2. Convey another Lady Bird Deed to someone else.

There is no Texas statute that supports the existence and validity of Lady Bird Deeds. The Lady Bird Deed is just a type of deed that is revokable. Yet courts have upheld their legality as a binding contract and testamentary instrument. Their primary purpose is to avoid the probate process for people that do not have much to their name beyond a house.

If a person passes away without having deeded their house to someone else, then the property must be passed on via probate – either through a will (if the decedent has one) or through intestate succession (divided among the decedent’s legal heirs). If a person dies without a will, a court must appoint a dependent administrator to be responsible for paying the decedent’s debts and going through the court every time they need to do something, such as list and sell a house. This can be expensive and cumbersome.

In Texas, if all a person has in their name is their house, executing a Lady Bird Deed is a smart way to avoid the hassle of probate.  The grantee can deed the house to the beneficiary of their choice, but continue to live in it and have the power to do what they want with the house in their lifetime. A Lady Bird Deed also gives the grantor the freedom to change their mind until they pass, because the deed does not become effective until the grantor’s death.

After the grantor passes, the grantee simply has to take a death certificate and an affidavit and file the deed in the real property records.

Stipulations of the Lady Bird Deed

There are a few stipulations of the Lady Bird Deed, such as:

  • While many states, like Texas, recognize this type of deed, not all of them do. If you don’t live in Texas, check that your state recognizes Enhanced Life Estate Warranty Deeds before you decide to use one to transfer property.
  • It is subject to abuse. For instance, someone on their deathbed could be made to sign a deed under undue influence or trickery. In this case, the deed to a grantee could be set aside if it can be shown there was undue influence or fraud exercised on the grantor. An example of this can be if one child locks mom away and will not let other children see her just to ensure she gets mom to sign the deed to her.
  • To be recognized, the deed must be properly notarized and filed in the county’s real property records.

Whether you are considering deeding your home to someone via a Lady Bird Deed, or if you think deed ownership should be contested, enlist the help of a reputable real estate attorney to determine your options.

What Stops a House from Being Sold

When the housing market is healthy and there is an abundance of buyers that can get into bidding wars over a property, one of the most asked questions of real estate attorneys is, “What stops a house from being sold?” For many buyers, there is nothing more frustrating than being locked in on a desired property when suddenly something hits the brakes.

The best way to minimize the chances of finding yourself in this situation is by understanding what stops a house from being sold so that you know what to look for and how to avoid this situation.

Buying and Selling Houses and the Role Title Companies Play

When a person wants to buy or sell a house, there is a process. Many buyers and sellers opt to work with a realtor, but some might be surprised to find it is not always necessary.

A buyer can work with the seller to negotiate a price, give some earnest money, and sign a contract saying they agree to buy the property. This is sometimes called an earnest money contract, which should then be deposited to a reputable title company.

From here, a title company is tasked with running a title search and preparing a formal report for the involved parties to review. The top 3 things a title company typically looks for and determines include:

  1. Is the person selling the property the sole owner of the property? If not, do they share a title with someone? If so, is the other person a spouse, ex-spouse, or a family member? Which parties are required to sign the paperwork for a legal and valid conveyance?
  2. How did the person selling the property get the property? In other words, did they buy it? Did they inherit it? Did they receive it as a gift?
  3. Are there any liens, encumbrances, or abstracts of judgements on the property in question?

Once the title company has the answers to the above questions, that information is then turned over to the buyer for a detailed review.

Now to answer the question, what do the above answers have to do with what stops a house from being sold?

  • If the seller contracting with the buyer represents that they are the sole owner when there is actually more than one owner, this can stop a house from being sold. For one person to sell the property they must have 100 percent ownership. If there is shared ownership of the property, all owners must sign off on the agreement.
  • Mineral Rights. The property contract should be extremely clear on whether the rights to the property include mineral rights or merely surface rights. Vague language and gray areas regarding mineral rights may be enough to stop a house from being sold.
  • It is necessary to know if there are any types of easements or leases against the property. If this is not made clear, it may be enough to halt the sale of the house before it can be lawfully completed.
  • If there are any mortgages, IRS liens for unpaid taxes, or property tax liens, they must be properly disclosed to the seller through official channels. Failure to do so can halt the sale of a house.

How a Real Estate Attorney Can Help with the Title Report Results

Getting the completed title report back is only part of the process. Hiring a seasoned and qualified real estate attorney to help sort through the title report results is the other.

For example, if a title report comes back with issues that need to be addressed, a real estate lawyer can assist with either correcting the issues or working with the relevant parties to get it resolved. Some of the most common issues attorneys deal with in title reports are ownership issues, in which case they can help with:

  • Determining if there needs to be another signatory and who that is.
  • Identifying if there is a problem in getting the necessary signature, determining what the problem is, and negotiating or offering something to get it. Negotiation may not be necessary if there is an issue of laches, statue of limitations, trespass to try title, etc., but each requires a real estate attorney’s legal experience.
  • Dealing with IRS tax liens. If there is a judgement or lien against a property for sale, the seller and title company must get approval from the Internal Revenue Service before finalizing the deal. The IRS will require property appraisals to know if the price is of fair market value. Once approved, the IRS will need to “release the property” to be sold. The result of this could be that all the proceeds of the sale go directly to the IRS to pay off the lien. Sellers that know this is likely to happen may want to back out of the sale. However, this is where an attorney for the buyer would help enforce the earnest money contract and sale, regardless where the proceeds end up going.
  • Enforcing earnest money contracts. If the buyer identifies a lien, easement, or some other kind of title issue and gets cold feet, they may want to back out. Again, a real estate attorney can help address the issue by enforcing the contract, working to get the title issues resolved, and pushing the sale through.

 

When it comes to what stops a house from being sold, most of the issues can deal with problematic results in a title report. To protect yourself, as the buyer or seller, reach out to a professional real estate attorney today.

Episode 433: Navigating Personal Liability: The Impact of Unpaid Employment Trust

Most employers understand that the US government expects them to collect employment and excise taxes from their employees’ pay, and that this withholding is to be paid over to the IRS. It can be tempting to use this money towards other business expenses, but employers should resist the impulse. Not all employers realize the impact of unpaid employment trust and how that relates to personal liability. The fact of the matter is if the employment trust isn’t paid, managers can be held personally liable to the IRS.

How Unpaid Employment Trusts Can Affect Personal Liability

The impact of unpaid employment trusts can be enormous for individuals. Despite the expectation that a business filing bankruptcy will extinguish all debts, including to the IRS, this is not the case. And even if the business itself has gone bankrupt and cannot pay employment trust liability, the IRS will find someone to hold personally liable for that debt. Much of this standard was set by the case of Begier vs the IRS from 1990. While it is a bit of an older case, it still sets the precedent and is very much applicable today.

However, before we break the case down, it is important to establish a couple of talking points first:

  1. Trust fund taxes are essentially employment withholding taxes due to the Internal Revenue Service.
  2. Employers pay their employees but hold some money out of those payments to pay the government taxes such as FICA, Social Security, and Medicare. This is called an employment trust. (Contrary to popular believe, a trust is not just something established by a person in the event of their death or incapacitation.) At its root, the definition of trust means having someone hold onto something for the benefit of another.

Now, back to Begier vs the IRS. In this situation, American International Airlines fell behind in paying its employment trust fund taxes, which the Internal Revenue Service was aware of. It was not a small sum by any standard. The airline eventually filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. For the first 90 days of the bankruptcy, they acted as a debtor in possession and, during that time, decided to reconcile the trust fund money they owed to the IRS. After 90 days, the court appointed a trustee to come in and take over for existing management.

When the appointed trustee found out about the large sum of money the airline had paid to the Internal Revenue Service when there were many debts still owed to other airline creditors, the trustee sued the IRS to attempt to recover the money. The argument the trustee made was that the IRS was no more superior to other creditors and thus should not get priority over available funds.

The court in Begier held that the money held in trust was never the airline’s money to begin with. So when they went into bankruptcy, those employment trust funds were not part of the “debtor’s estate.” The trustee was not able to recover those funds

But the bigger question is why the airline managers decided to pay off employment trust taxes rather than pay off some of the other airline creditors, especially knowing that some of the other debts were just as large, if not larger, than the IRS debt. While the intentions of the managers cannot be known exactly, it is very likely that they understood that if that particular debt was not paid before the company had no money left, that debt would not be extinguished in the bankruptcy and the human individuals responsible for running the business would be held personally liable for those debts for years to come.

This is important, so we will repeat it again: business managers who are signatories on the company bank account and the people responsible for signing the checks to the IRS, known as “responsible parties” , may be held personally liabile for employment trust and excise taxes if is the business does not pay this money over to the IRS. It may not happen immediately, but if substantial sums of money are due for employment or excise taxes, individuals will eventually receive notices from the IRS that their liability is under examination and they may be personally, and singularly, responsible for potentially millions of dollars owed to the IRS. That is precisely why the airline chose to take the remaining chunk of money they had and paid it to the IRS rather than other creditors.

One would expect that that if a business files bankruptcy, that much of the business’ debt can be forgiven. Employers take note: trust fund liability on the employer’s part does not go away. It is not a dischargeable debt. While federal income tax liability has a statute of limitation and may eventually be discharged, trust fund taxes cannot. A former employer can be retired and living off social security, the business long since dissolved, and the IRS will still expect payments to be made towards employment trust taxes that were never paid.

 

When a Company Is Liquidated and Trust Fund Taxes Are Still Due

There could be an instance in which a company files bankruptcy, is liquidated, and now no longer exists. Some wrongly think the taxes due will just go away.

Instead of the taxes being forgotten, the IRS will then search for the responsible parties. A responsible party is typically defined as someone who is an officer at the company and has the ability to sign checks.

Now, let’s assume that the IRS has found a responsible party. The options can vary and may include one of the following:

  • File an Offer In Compromise. In this scenario, the responsible party will state their assets and income and estimate what money they will have available after living expenses during the next five years. This is not a popular option among attorneys and clients because they are a lot of work and a satisfactory compromise, from the individual’s perspective, is hard to reach. .
  • Enter into an installment agreement and make regular payments. This is an agreement where the responsible party admits to owing the total amount the IRS requests and allows the responsible party to pay money to the IRS over time in installments. The IRS will then have the ability to garnish bank accounts directly, typically withdrawing monthly installments.
  • Run and hide. This is exactly what it sounds like. If the responsible party does not have the money to pay, they may opt to permanently leave the country. Some people choose to find jobs overseas where they can function. However, if the amount owed is large and criminal, the Internal Revenue Service can seek extradition.

Technically, the IRS has a 10-year collection statute in which they have to collect or reduce the assessment to a judgement. If it is a relatively small amount owed, it is possible the IRS will choose not to pursue you.  Should the amount owed be between $50 million and $100 million, they likely will pursue you. The clients we see are often held personally liable to amounts between $1 – $25 million. Often, international relocation is not an option – these clients have family and personal responsibilities in the USA, or the idea of leaving their home is unfathomable. Staying and dealing with the debt may mean having to give up 50% of their social security checks to the IRS every month.

The bottom line is that if employers do not realize the impact of unpaid employment trust they may be penalized heavily for it. Companies should pay over the trust fund taxes as soon as they are due and make it their priority to do so before the court can take that ability away from them.

If you are business owner, current or former, and you are dealing with personal liability for unpaid employment trust taxes, a reputable tax attorney can assist.